Recently, I received the following simple suggestion in an e-mail message:
please include the following:A Recovering American soldier
C/o Walter Reed Army Medical Center
6900 Georgia Avenue,NW
Washington,D.C. 20307-5001
I hit the forward button and was about to add my own sentence or two. At that moment, a still, small voice somewhere inside said, “Check your facts.” The voice was that of teachers from days gone by, teachers who had so carefully taught me and my classmates to think for ourselves.
Instead of proceeding with the e-mail message, I used the same procedure that I have used and suggested to others for quite a few years:
- I highlighted a portion of the text in that e-mail message and copied it (Control-C). In this case, the first three lines of the message looked like something which would return on-point hits.
- I pulled up Google, clicked in the search window, used the “paste” command (Control-V), and hit “Enter.”
Within seconds, the verdict was obvious. It was a hoax. The most compelling evidence was this link where Walter Reed addressed this topic, saying:
The Walter Reed site goes to say:
Instead of sending an “Any Wounded Soldier” letter or package to Walter Reed, please consider making a donation to one of the more than 300 nonprofit organizations dedicated to helping our troops and their families listed on the “America Supports You” website, www.americasupportsyou.mil
Other organizations that offer means of showing your support for our troops or assist wounded service members and their families include:
At a time of year when we are giving thanks for our many blessings and approaching a season of giving, perhaps the message from Walter Reed is the one worthy of spreading.
Had I simply forwarded the e-mail and sent a few cards, my cards would have never reached the eyes of any solider. Instead, my good intentions would have added an additional load to the personnel charged with disposing of the glut of mail which they currently receive. Rather than being part of something good, I would have only added to an already existing problem.
Why do I go to the trouble to determine the truth in an e-mail before I pass it on? The reason is simple: I am a teacher. Truth matters.
Our world has become one in which good information is only a few key strokes away. Unfortunately, the same holds true for bad information. If teaching young people how to distinguish fact from fiction was important for generations gone by, it becomes an absolute necessity today.
How can we teach our students to question what they read? (To give credit where credit is due, many of them do a much better job of this than we as adults.) I wish I had the complete answer. At least, as a start, I do feel this: Truth will only be important to them if first it is important to me.
@WR
November 19, 2007 4:32 amPlease, please, please DO NOT send Christmas cards to Walter Reed. I know that there are mixed reports out there, but I have seen it first hand. Cards without return addresses are sorted and returned to the postal facility. Cards that have return addresses are sorted, Walter Reed address and bar code marked out, and a card from the post commander saying, “Thank you, but don’t send anymore.” is hand addressed by the Soldiers that the cards are intended for, and returned to sender.
I know that many people did not have their letters returned because of the volume of mail. Wounded Warrior worked from 0800-1500 every weekday from November until March to return the nearly 1 million pieces of mail, but the “Walter Reed” scandal story broke and brought an end to the mail room operation to return the mail.
I can only assume that the mail that was not returned was destroyed.
I hope that this brings perspective as to WHY NOT send Christmas cards to Walter Reed.
Dr. Frank Buck
November 19, 2007 7:51 amThank you for the additional information and helping to illustrate the problem. Somtimes our best intentions turn out causing problems for others. This example illustrates how important it is for all of us to check our facts. Those of us in the field of education ought to be leading the charge in this arena.
-Frank